Culture, politics, science, philosophy.
General manifesto *****
Immigration manifesto
The deep Crisis of the West
Permalinks
Promoted by Norwegian public broadcaster Nrk
28.03.2010. Please spend five minutes on the following thought-provoking video: Classic Pallywood from Norwegian Public Broadcaster Nrk.
Must be defeated
27.03.2010. FrontPage Magazine has Interviewed the Indian-American politician Vijay Kumar about how to defeat the jihadists.
Operate more or less freely in Switzerland?
Blind violence in Switzerland.
16.03.2010. They don’t have to worry about punishment for their actions even in Switzerland, only sympathetic help classes or perhaps a neat adventurous vacation. A group of young refugees from the Balkans attacked two 17-year-old students for no reason and seriously injured them. The target of the attack, as usual, was the head. The victims suffered broken face bones. Continue reading at Politically Incorrect.
HonestThinking comments: A culture that tolerates this kind of behavior from anyone, in particular from immigrants, is sick.
A perfect storm is brewing
11.03.2010. The emerging errors of the IPCC's 2007 report are not incidental but fundamental, says Christopher Booker in The Telegraph.
Labour betrayed the Britons
03.03.2010. Excerpts from The secret plot to destroy Britain’s identity, by Melanie Phillips in The Daily Mail:
It was done in the full knowledge that the people actually wanted immigration reduced.
And we also discover that those who expressed such concerns were dismissed with utter contempt as racists — and it was further suggested that ministers should manipulate public opinion in an attempt to change people’s attitudes.
Well, they have certainly tried to do that by hanging the disgusting label of ‘racism’ round the neck of anyone who dares voice such concerns.
Thus the eminent and decent Labour MP Frank Field found himself smeared as a racist for daring to suggest that the rate of immigration should be reduced.
What bullying arrogance. The real prejudice is surely to believe that opposition to mass migration can never be based on any reasonable objection.
The implications of this covert policy are quite staggering. Ministers deliberately set out to change the cultural and ethnic identity of this country in secret.
They did this mainly because they hated what Britain was, a largely homogeneous society rooted in 1,000 years of history. They therefore set out to replace it by a totally new kind of multicultural society — and one in which the vast majority of newcomers could be expected to vote Labour.
They set out to destroy the right of the British people to live in a society defined by a common history, religion, law, language and traditions. They set out to destroy for ever what it means to be culturally British and to put another ‘multicultural’ identity in its place.
And they then had the gall to declare that to have love for or pride in that authentic British identity, and to want to protect and uphold it, was racist.
So the very deepest feelings of people for their country were damned as bigotry, for which crime they were to have their noses rubbed in mass immigration until they changed their attitudes.
What an appalling abuse of power. Yet even now they are denying that this is what they did. Yesterday, the Immigration Minister Phil Woolas blustered that the advisory unit report had not been accepted by ministers at the time.
But the fact is that mass immigration actually happened. The only thing ministers hadn’t accepted was that the truth about their intentions should be revealed to the public.
Surreally, Mr Woolas further claims that the Government has brought immigration down.
But the reductions he is talking about have taken place on the separate issue of asylum. The impact of the Government’s new points scheme upon the record rate of immigration growth has been negligible.
The truth is that these early drafts of the advisory unit’s report have blown open one of the greatest political scandals of the Labour years. At no stage did Labour’s election manifestos make any reference to a policy of mass immigration nor the party’s aim of creating a multicultural society.
What we have been subjected to is a deliberate deception of the voters and a gross abuse of democracy.
There could scarcely be a more profound abuse of the democratic process than to set out to destroy a nation’s demographic and cultural identity through a conscious deception of the people of that nation. It is an act of collective national treachery.
Read the entire article at Melanie Phillips' blog.
Home
Permalinks to older articles
|